Legal Opinion
State ex rel. State Office for Services to Children & Families v. Klamath Tribe
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 27, 2000No. 9700470JV; CA A104784; 9700534JV; CA A104785PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
This is a consolidated proceeding involving eight children who are within the dependency jurisdiction of the juvenile court. ORS 419B.100. The State Office for Services to Children and Families (SCF) and the Klamath Tribe (the Tribe) appeal from the trial court’s declaratory judgment that none of the children was an “Indian child” and, thus, could not be subject to an “Indian Child Welfare Act Agreement” (the agreement) executed in 1989 between the Tribe and SCF. We review for errors of law and affirm.
The children, who are all in the custody of SCF, sought a judgment directing SCF to proceed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Strate v. A-1 ContractorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hornell Brewing Co. v. Rosebud Sioux Tribal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In The Interest Of A.w. And S.w., Minor Children, Woodbury County Attorney And A.w. And S.w., Minor Children Vs. IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- Sacramento County Department of Health & Human Services v. Joseph A.California Supreme Court · 2016
- Vick v. CecilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- In Re Adoption of AmcSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Department of Social & Health Services v. B.D.W.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.