Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Edrington

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 2001PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

¶ 1 The Commonwealth asks us to determine whether the trial court erroneously failed to sentence Appellee/Cross-Appel-lant, Thomas Lee Edrington, to the mandatory minimum sentence of twenty-five years pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A § 9714, following a guilty plea to his third violent offense. We hold that the Commonwealth’s issue challenging the legality of Edrington’s sentence is cognizable on appeal, despite the Commonwealth’s failure to file the ordered Rule 1925(b) Concise Statement of Matters Complained of on Appeal. We further hold that the trial court erred when it refused to apply the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. MoirSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. VasquezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. BerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. InfanteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. FosterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. MessmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API