Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Butler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 2000PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

In this direct appeal we are asked to determine whether the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas properly found the provisions of 42 Pa.C.S. § 9714, which impose an enhanced mandatory sentence when a person is found to be a high risk dangerous offender, to be unconstitutional because the statutory scheme places the burden on the defendant to rebut the presumption that he is a high risk dangerous offender by clear and convincing evidence. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.1

*326On February 18, 1998, at approximately 12:30 p.m., the victim, Marco Rivera, was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Nos. 96-5132, 96-5416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. ShifflerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. Bomar, A., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. PanderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API