Commonwealth v. Vasquez
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NEWMAN, Justice.
In this direct appeal, we must resolve whether a trial court had the authority to impose a mandatory fine, which it initially neglected to render in its judgement of sentence. At issue in this case is the interpretation by a trial court of the mandatory minimum sentencing provisions of 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508. The trial court concluded, and the Superior Court agreed, that where the Commonwealth properly invokes the mandatory sentencing provisions found in 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508, the trial court must apply the entire, relevant provision and can correct, at any time, a sentence it…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GribbleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. IsabellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Fajohn v. Com., Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Batts, Q., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. InfanteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. Eisenberg, M., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. TobinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.