Legal Opinion
Keith L. & Kay Burdine Holmquist And Fredrick Kaseburg v. City Of Seattle
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 8, 2016No. 73335-4-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, J.
¶ 1 Keith and Kay Holmquist and Frederick Kaseburg (collectively the owners) prevailed against King County (County) and the city of Seattle (City) in this action to quiet title to certain Seattle real property. Both the City and the County appealed, but only the City filed a notice of supersedeas without bond. After we affirmed the trial court judgment, the owners moved the trial court to award damages resulting from the City’s decision to supersede the judgment quieting title. The trial court denied their motion. We now reverse that decision and remand the matter to the superior court for…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
- Mason v. Mortgage America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Highline School District No. 401 v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Badgley Mullins Turner, Pllc App./x-resp. v. Leslie Spencer & Tammy S., Blakey, Resp./x-app.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Altanatural Inc v. New Investments IncUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- City Of Seattle v. Frederick A. KaseburgCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- City Of Woodinville, V. Eastside Community Rail, LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
- Eritrean Association in Greater Seattle v. Henock Teckle Gebrekidan et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.