Legal Opinion
Thomson, S.A. v. Quixote Corporation and Disc Manufacturing, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 25, 1999No. 97-1485PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Circuit Judge.
Thomson, S.Á. (“Thomson”) appeals from the June 24, 1997 order of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in an action for patent infringement. See Thomson, S.A. v. Quixote Corp., 979 F.Supp. 286 (D.Del.1997) (“Thomson /”). The court denied Thomson’s motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or in the alternative for a new trial, and sustained the jury verdict that U.S. Patent Nos. 4,868,808, 5,182,743, 4,961,183, and 5,175,725 are invalid for lack of novelty under 35 U.S.C. § 102(g). We affirm.
Background
Plaintiff-Appellant Thomson is the assign-ee of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Alan Waner, Plaintiff-Cross v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Oney v. RatliffCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Netscape Communications Corp. v. VALUECLICK, INC.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- Michael S. Brown, Joseph L. Goldstein, and Yuval Reiss v. Mariano Barbacid and Veeraswamy ManneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- LifeScan, Inc. v. Home Diagnostics, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.