Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 15, 2003No. 03-407 CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

In this case, Plaintiff Patrick M. Smith, acting pro se, alleges a claim to back pay and allowances, and interest thereon, commensurate with service in the United States Army at the pay grade of E-4 for the period from his general court-martial through the date he was originally scheduled for discharge. Plaintiff avers that the judge advocate who presided over his court-martial and conviction for kidnaping, rape, and murder was not qualified to sit as the military judge in his proceeding because he was not an active member of the highest court of his…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Jet, Inc. v. Sewage Aeration SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. The Young Engineers, Inc., (Aka Tye or Tye, Inc.,) v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Larson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Lewis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API