Legal Opinion

Martin-Kahill Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Skidmore

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1983No. 8225SC663PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRASWELL, Judge.

Plaintiff first argues that the court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment against defendant. It is well-settled that denial of a motion for summary judgment is interlocutory and therefore not appealable, unless a substantial right of one of the parties would be affected if the appeal were not heard prior to final judgment. Leasing Corp. v. Myers, 46 N.C. App. 162, 265 S.E. 2d 240, appeal dismissed, 301 N.C. 92 (1980). In this case, plaintiff appealed from the denial of its motion after a full trial had been held and jury verdict returned in its favor. The issue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Equitable Leasing Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Motyka v. NappierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Parker Oil Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Seymour v. WS BOYD SALES COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Standing v. MidgettDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1993
  2. Pate v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API