Pate v. Thomas
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Judge.
The foregoing facts clearly establish that defendants breached their unqualified, unambiguous covenant that the property sold plaintiffs was free of encumbrances when they delivered the deed to plaintiffs while Northwestern Bank’s unpaid deed of trust was still recorded against the property, Cover v. McAden, 183 N.C. 641, 112 S.E. 817 (1922), and the only question suggested by the facts is whether plaintiffs’ suit is barred because they may have known about the encumbrance before receiving the deed. Before determining that question, however, the remarkable number of errors…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Overman v. Gibson Products Co. of Thomasville, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Cover v. . McAdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Gibbs v. DukeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Philbin Investments, Inc. v. Orb Enterprises, Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Martin-Kahill Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. SkidmoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nelson v. Hartford Underwriters InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Bumgarner v. TomblinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989