Legal Opinion

Pate v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 15, 1988No. 8724DC689PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

The foregoing facts clearly establish that defendants breached their unqualified, unambiguous covenant that the property sold plaintiffs was free of encumbrances when they delivered the deed to plaintiffs while Northwestern Bank’s unpaid deed of trust was still recorded against the property, Cover v. McAden, 183 N.C. 641, 112 S.E. 817 (1922), and the only question suggested by the facts is whether plaintiffs’ suit is barred because they may have known about the encumbrance before receiving the deed. Before determining that question, however, the remarkable number of errors…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Overman v. Gibson Products Co. of Thomasville, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Cover v. . McAdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Gibbs v. DukeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Philbin Investments, Inc. v. Orb Enterprises, Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Martin-Kahill Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. SkidmoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Hartford Underwriters InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Bumgarner v. TomblinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API