Parker Oil Co. v. Smith
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment against defendant Smith. However, that question is not before us. A motion for summary judgment is simply a pretrial motion. Denial of a motion for summary judg ment does not determine the merits of the case. It merely means that the case proceeds to trial. Annot. 15 A.L.R. 3d 899 (1967).
Denial of a motion for summary judgment ordinarily does not affect a substantial right so that appeal may be taken from the interlocutory order. See, e.g. Stonestreet v. Motors, Inc., 18 N.C. App. 527, 197…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Motyka v. NappierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Stonestreet v. Compton Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harris v. WaldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Ballenger v. BowenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Corum v. University of North Carolina Ex Rel. Board of GovernorsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Hill v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Mas Corp. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.