Legal Opinion

Gregory v. Carey

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 18, 1990No. 63,321PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

On October 28, 1985, Mark Marquette sustained catastrophic brain damage while being prepared for knee surgery. He has since been in a persistent vegetative state — a state of “wakeful unresponsiveness” — from which he does not visibly react and will never completely recover. Charlotte Gregory brought this action as Marquette’s guardian and conservator. After extensive pretrial discovery, defendants admitted liability and the case *505went to trial on the sole issue of damages. The jury returned the following verdict:

Present value of future…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McDougald v. GarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Bacon v. Mercy Hosp. of Ft. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  3. Farley v. EngelkenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  4. Kansas Malpractice Victims Coalition v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  5. Leiker Ex Rel. Leiker v. GaffordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. McGee v. AC AND S, INC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  3. Smith v. PrintupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  4. Garhart Ex Rel. Tinsman v. Columbia/HealthOne, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  5. Rose v. via Christi Health System, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API