Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State, Department of Corrections, Board of Parole

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 2010No. S-13079PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this appeal we review the revocation of William Bailey's parole. After his conviction Bailey was ordered to "actively participate and successfully complete substance abuse treatment if offered" during his incarceration. At Bailey's initial parole hearing, the parole board directed Bailey to apply to a residential substance abuse treatment program. Bailey applied to a treatment program, but was rejected after raising legitimate concerns about the program's restrictions on his right to access the courts. Bailey successfully grieved those restrictions,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. John Andrew DaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. Paul v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Smith v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Protective Proceedings of Tammy J.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections v. Trevor StefanoAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Commonwealth v. Hoover, T., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API