Legal Opinion

In Re the Protective Proceedings of Tammy J.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2012No. S-13698PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The parents of a developmentally disabled adult woman appeal the superior court's decision to appoint the public guardian, rather than the parents, as the woman's legal guardian. The superior court found that the parents failed to take advantage of resources available for the daughter's development and did not support the daughter's contact with extended family. The parents appealed. The parents argue that they should have been appointed as guardians and that the appointment of a public guardian, in the absence of clear and convincing evidence…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Summer Sagoonick v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  2. In re Guardianship of Benjamin E.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Edna L. v. State of Alaska, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services, John L. v. State of Alaska, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Villars v. VillarsAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Villars v. VillarsAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API