Legal Opinion
In re New York State Urban Development Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 13, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Stanley Parness, J.
In this concluded condemnation proceeding, claimant, pursuant to EDPL 701, requests an additional allowance for at*901torney’s fees, and other expenses incurred. Condemnor’s preliminary objection based upon the timeliness of this request (postjudgment) has been rejected by the Court of Appeals (General Crushed Stone Co. v State of New York, 93 NY2d 23).
As to the merits of this EDPL 701 application, claimant seeks reimbursement in the total sum of $883,073 of which $20,298 represents the expert witness expenses, $723 miscellaneous expenses, and $862,052…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hakes v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- In re the New York Transit AuhorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Beatie v. DeLongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- First Bank & Trust Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- City of Yonkers v. Celwyn Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Norman Industrial Development Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- In re the Acquisition of Real Property by the Village of Johnson CityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- City of New York v. Jamaica Arms Hotel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Acquisition of Real Property by the County of TompkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.