Legal Opinion

Larry Seaquist v. Michelle Caldier

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 9, 2019No. 50816-8PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two April 9, 2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II LARRY SEAQUIST and CARLA SEAQUIST, No. 50816-8-II and the marital community comprised thereof, Appellants, v. MICHELLE CALDIER, a single person, PUBLISHED OPINION Respondent. WORSWICK, J. — In 2014, Larry Seaquist and Michelle Caldier were competing for 26th District State Representative. Larry and Carla Seaquist allege that Caldier defamed Seaquist and placed him in a false light through political campaign materials and in an interview. Caldier moved for summary…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mark v. Seattle TimesWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Dunlap v. WayneWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Eastwood v. Cascade Broadcasting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Mohr v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Mohr v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Advance N.M. Now PACNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. 3M Company v. AIME LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
  3. Al-Bustani v. AlgerDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
  4. Emmanuel v. King CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
  5. Hosseinzadeh v. Bellevue Park Homeowners AssociationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API