Jaime Perez-Enriquez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
463 F.3d 1007
Jaime PEREZ-ENRIQUEZ, Petitioner,
v.
Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 03-70244.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 23, 2006.
Filed September 15, 2006.
Raul R. Labrador, Nampa, ID, Robert H. Gibbs, Robert H. Pauw, Gibbs Houston Pauw, Seattle, WA, for the petitioner.
Francis W. Fraser, Deborah N. Misir, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.
Stephen W. Manning, Jennifer M. Rotman, and Jessica M. Boell, American Immigration Lawyers Association, Portland, OR, for Amicus.
On Petition for Review of an Order…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Wardlaw; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Bybee; Dissent.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Augustin Valenzuela Gallardo v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016