Legal Opinion

Augustin Valenzuela Gallardo v. Loretta E. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 31, 2016No. 12-72326PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge CHRISTEN; Dissent by Judge SEABRIGHT. ' '

OPINION

CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge:

Augustin Valenzuela Gallardo, a citizen of Mexico, pleaded guilty to -violating California Penal Code § 32, accessory to a felony. An immigration' judge (IJ) ordered him removed to Mexico, concluding that his conviction constituted an “offense relating to obstruction of justice” and therefore an aggravated felony under the Immigration and-Nationality Act (INA) § 101(a)(43)(S). The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissed Valenzuela Gallardo’s appeal. In its decision, it announced a new interpretation…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ramon Jasso Arangure v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Edwin FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Istvan Szonyi v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Alberto Mendez-Garcia v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Patricia Flores v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API