Legal Opinion

Stockley v. Cissna

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1907PublishedCited by 20 opinions

FROM TIPTON. Appeal from tlie Chancery Court of Tipton County.— John S. Cooper, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

This is an action of forcible entry and detainer. The •object of the bill is to recover the possession of two tracts of land situated in Tipton county, Tennessee. These tracts adjoin, but are described in the bill separately, for the reason that complainant’s title and right •of possession to each is derived from a different source. *140The smaller of the two tracts comprises about one hundred and thirty-one acres, and is embraced in a tract of two thousand, acres originally granted in the year 1824 by the State of Tennessee to Simon Huddleston. The larger tract, comprising about 1,050 acres,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. St. Louis v. RutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Mulry v. . NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Missouri v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Manry v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Wood v. McAlpineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Keel v. SuttonTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. HuffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Holt v. McCannCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API