Legal Opinion
Glasfloss Corp. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 5, 1950PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
The corporate defendants move to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division, pursuant to Section 1404(a) of Title 28 United States Code Annotated.
The action is one arising under the antitrust laws of the United States 'for treble damages suffered by plaintiff by reason of an alleged monopoly of trade and commerce in glass fibers and glass fiber products as well as by reason of certain alleged unfair and unlawful trade practices.
Plaintiff is a Connecticut corporation qualified to do business in the State…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Magnetic Engineering & Mfg. Co. v. Dings Magnetic Separator Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Mazula v. Delaware & Hudson R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company v. IgoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Brown & BigelowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Hill v. Upper Mississippi Towing CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1956
- Leyden v. Excello CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1960
- Leopard Roofing Co. v. Asphalt Roofing Industry BureauDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.