Legal Opinion

Magnetic Engineering & Mfg. Co. v. Dings Magnetic Separator Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 4, 1950PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

There are numerous motions by both plaintiff and defendant in this action now pending before the Court. Plaintiff moves to (1) amend the complaint, and (2) secure a temporary injunction. Defendant moves (1) for a transfer of the action under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1406 for improper venue, (2) for transfer because of forum non conveniens under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1404, (3) to dismiss a portion of the complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted, and (4) for a more definite statement as to certain matters in the complaint. The motions will be considered and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Hutchinson v. Chase & Gilbert, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. United States v. National City Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Kilpatrick v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Magnetic Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. Dings Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. Caribe Trailer Systems, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
  3. Harry Rich Corporation v. Curtiss-Wright CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  4. Nocona Leather Goods Co. v. A. G. Spalding & Bros.District Court, D. Delaware · 1958
  5. McCarley v. Foster-Milburn Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1950

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API