Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Blackwater Boom & Lumber Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1904PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Tucker County. Action by Catharine R. Griffith and others against the Black-•water Boom & Lumber Company and others, and by Albert 'Thompson against the same defendants. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

POFFENBARGER, PRESIDENT:

This is a somewhat complicated and a hotly contested case -which has been in this Conrt on a former appeal. As then -passed upon it is reported in 46 W. Ya. 56, where the nature of the controversy and the history of the transactions out of which ■it arose are substantially set forth. It was impossible there, as ■it is here, to give in detail, or even‘enumerate, all that is con■tained in the old record of more than seven hundred pages, to •which nearly three hundred pages have since been added.

After the case was remanded to the circuit court for further ■■proceedings…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Smith v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  4. Mumma v. Potomac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1834
  5. People v. Globe Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1883

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sult v. A. Hochstetter Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Brady v. OliverTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Felsenheld v. Bloch Bros. Tobacco Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Gall v. CowellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Continental Realty Corporation v. Andrew J. Crevolin Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API