Legal Opinion

Felsenheld v. Bloch Bros. Tobacco Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1937No. CC 561PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Judge:

The circuit court has certified herein to this court the question of the sufficiency of an amended bill as amplified and supplemented in some of its features by a second amended bill. The allegations of the bills present different elements of controversy arising from the same subject matter. The circuit court sustained demurrers to certain features of the bills and overruled them as to others. The original bill is not involved as it was entirely supplanted by the amended bills.

The plaintiffs are Emanuel Felsenheld as trustee under the will of Aaron Bloch, deceased, and Nita…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dodge v. WoolseySupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Sweeny v. Sugar Refining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Depue v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Wilson v. KennedyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Young v. Columbia Oil Co. of West VirginiaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Dunn v. RockwellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Masinter v. Webco Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Paddock v. SiemoneitTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Province v. ProvinceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API