Legal Opinion
Caribbean Yacht Works, Ltd. v. M/V "Neenah Z," U.K.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided August 1, 2005No. 05-60962-CIVPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OMNIBUS ORDER
HUCK, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Claimant/Owner Adventure Charter’s Emergency Motion for Release of a Vessel (D.E.# 15) and Plaintiffs Motion to Amend the Complaint (D.E.# 21). Having reviewed the parties’ submissions and other pertinent portions of the record, having heard arguments of counsel in open court at hearings conducted on July 5, 2005, July 13, 2005, and July 29, 2005, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, the Court hereby DENIES Adventure Charter’s Emergency Motion and GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion to Amend the Complaint for the reasons…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Submersible Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. Perforadora Central, S.A. De C v. Defendant/appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Sembawang Shipyard, Ltd., Cross-Appellant v. Charger, Inc., and M/v Charger, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Trinidad Foundry & Fabricating, Ltd. v. M/V K.A.S. CamillaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- George Gaetano Labanca v. Geraldo Ostermunchner and Dana Marie OstermunchnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Dannebrog Rederi AS v. M/Y TRUE DREAMDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Blow v. Carnival CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023