Legal Opinion
In Re Lesansky
California Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 2001No. S079499PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
104 Cal.Rptr.2d 409 (2001)
25 Cal.4th 11
17 P.3d 764
In re Stuart K. LESANSKY, On Discipline.
No. S079499.
Supreme Court of California.
March 1, 2001.
As Modified March 28, 2001.
Pansky & Markle, R. Gerald Markle and Ellen A. Pansky, South Pasadena, for Petitioner Stuart K. Lesansky.
Marie M. Moffat and Richard J. Zanassi, San Francisco, for Respondent The State Bar of California.
KENNARD, J.
Since January 1, 1997, the Legislature has provided for summary disbarment of an attorney convicted of a felony involving moral turpitude. (Bus. & Prof.Code, § 6102, subd. (c); Stats.1996, ch. 1104, § 6.) In this…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- J. C. Penney Casualty Insurance v. M. K.California Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. ShazierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Griffiths v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against DayWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DayWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Benninghoff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.