Legal Opinion

People v. Shazier

California Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2014No. S208398PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

We granted the People’s petition for review after the Court of Appeal overturned, for the second time, a jury’s finding that defendant Dariel Shazier must be committed for secure confinement and treatment as a sexually violent predator (SVP) under the sexually violent predators act (SVPA; Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.). As the instant jury heard, defendant has served two separate prison terms for sex crimes, some forcible, against 13- to 17-year-old boys. Each time he was released on parole from the first sentence, with prohibitions against contact with minors, he soon…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. People v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. FryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. AriasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. Frandsen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  3. People v. Daveggio & MichaudCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. People v. KrebsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  5. People v. SuarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API