People v. Shazier
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
We granted the People’s petition for review after the Court of Appeal overturned, for the second time, a jury’s finding that defendant Dariel Shazier must be committed for secure confinement and treatment as a sexually violent predator (SVP) under the sexually violent predators act (SVPA; Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.). As the instant jury heard, defendant has served two separate prison terms for sex crimes, some forcible, against 13- to 17-year-old boys. Each time he was released on parole from the first sentence, with prohibitions against contact with minors, he soon…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. FryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. AriasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- People v. Frandsen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. Daveggio & MichaudCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. KrebsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. SuarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.