Legal Opinion

In Re United Parcel Service, Inc. (Ohio) United Parcel Service United Parcel Service of America

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 24, 1988No. 88-3016Published

1Per curiam

Petitioner, United Parcel Service, (“UPS”) seeks the issuance of a writ of mandumus to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, directing that Court to vacate its order of January 7, 1988, 677 F.Supp. 912, enjoining UPS’s new tariff, which excluded the shipment of fireworks by the carrier. Because we agree that the District Court had no jurisdiction to enjoin the new UPS tariff, we hereby issue a writ of mandamus to the District Court ordering the Court to vacate its January 7, 1988 injunction.

On November 24, 1987, UPS filed a proposed tariff with the Interstate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. The Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad Company v. The Interstate Commerce Commission, and Gpu Service Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  3. B.J. Alan Co. v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API