Legal Opinion
B.J. Alan Co. v. United Parcel Service
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided January 7, 1988No. C87-3498-YPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BATTISTI, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs have come before this Court seeking a temporary order which will assure that the shipping services provided by United Parcel Service (“UPS”), a common carrier, prior to December 31, 1987 are continued during the pendency of a full review by the Interstate Commerce Commission (“ICC”) of the lawfulness of Defendants’ new tariff. As such, this Court has been called upon to assure that equity and justice is served in a matter which is coincidingly tracking through the ICC’s administrative procedures.
A hearing was held in this Court on January 5, 1988. Counsel…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Friendship Materials, Inc. v. Michigan Brick, Inc., Cadillac Brick Co., and Century Brick Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Southern Railway Co. v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re Delorean Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Mason County Medical Ass'n v. KnebelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re United Parcel Service, Inc. (Ohio) United Parcel Service United Parcel Service of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988