The Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad Company v. The Interstate Commerce Commission, and Gpu Service Corporation, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.
The issue in this case is simply whether the Interstate Commerce Commission (“Commission” or “ICC”) has the authority to order railroads to carry spent nuclear fuel and low-level reactor wastes at rates prescribed by the Commission. Petitioners are twenty-two eastern railroad companies (“the railroads”) which seek relief from the Commission’s order compelling them to cancel their abstention, or “flagout,” from publication of tariffs for the carriage of nuclear materials. The Commission’s order was the culmination of proceedings begun in 1976 when five separate…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Surface Transportation Board and the United States of America, West Texas Utilities Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- The Chlorine Institute, Inc. v. Soo Line RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Delphi-Delco Electronics Systems v. M/V NEDLLOYD EUROPADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- National Steel Service Center, Inc. v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Riffin v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.