Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Barrett

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 16, 2006PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

The respondent, Donal B. Barrett, appeals from a decision of a single justice on an information filed in the county court by the Board of Bar Overseers (board) accepting its recommendation that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for two years. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

1. Background. The following facts are drawn from the findings of a hearing committee that were adopted by an appeal panel of the board, and eventually by the full board.

In 1995, NetFax Incorporated (NetFax) was organized under the laws of Delaware to develop and commercially exploit new…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. In the Matter of HissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Chelsea Industries, Inc. v. GaffneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. In the Matter of AlterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. In the Matter of SaabMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. In the Matter of the Discipline of an AttorneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re HilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. In re BrauerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. In re McBrideMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  4. In re CurryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  5. In re MurrayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API