Legal Opinion

Chelsea Industries, Inc. v. Gaffney

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 29, 1983PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

The defendants appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court adopting and confirming the report of a master. The master found that the defendants were liable in damages to the plaintiff for setting up a competing business in violation of the fiduciary duty the defendants owed the plaintiff. The judgment ordered and adjudged the defendants to be “jointly and severally [liable to the plaintiff] in the amount of $496,009.72, together with costs.” Essentially, the defendants claim that they “had the right to plan and prepare for creation of a competing business while carrying on the normal duties…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Lolos v. BerlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. Maryland Metals, Inc. v. MetznerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Entrialgo v. Twin City Dodge, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Jet Courier Service, Inc. v. MuleiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. Meehan v. SHAUGHNESSY COHENMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Augat, Inc. v. Aegis, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Hanover Insurance v. SuttonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API