Kohl v. Housing Auth. of City of Bloomington, Ill.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
J. WALDO ACKERMAN, District Judge.
This case arises from a rental dispute between the plaintiff and the Bloomington Housing Authority (hereinafter referred to as BHA). It raises the question of the propriety of the BHA’s establishing certain eligibility requirements before issuing a Certificate of Family Participation to applicants seeking housing under Section 201(a)(8) of the United States Housing and Development Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f (hereinafter referred to as “Section 8”). Three United States District Courts and the .United States Courts of Appeal for the Third and Sixth…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doris Holbrook v. Henry C. Pitt, and Third-Party v. Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Third- PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Ferguson v. Metropolitan Development & Housing AgencyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1980
- Vandermark v. Housing Authority of City of YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Baker v. Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1980
- Vandermark v. HOUSING AUTH. OF CITY OF YORKDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morrisania II Associates v. HarveyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988
- Hill v. RichardsonDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1990