Legal Opinion

Hill v. Richardson

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided July 5, 1990No. IP 87-232-CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ENTRY REGARDING APPROVAL OF STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AS TO ALL ISSUES EXCEPT ATTORNEYS’ FEES

TINDER, District Judge.

I. Introduction

The difficulty that people of lower economic means in this country have in obtaining adequate housing is not a new problem. Many solutions to this dilemma have been offered and attempted through the years, both through private and public efforts. The subject of this case is a housing subsidy program of the federal government, often called a “finders-keepers” program, that was designed to offer at least some assistance to those who could not otherwise…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Charlene Hill v. John F. Richardson, Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Ellis v. RitchieDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
  3. Cain v. Allegheny County Housing AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Sweeney v. Housing Authority of Chester County (In re Sweeney)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API