Legal Opinion
Ferguson v. Metropolitan Development & Housing Agency
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided March 5, 1980No. 78-3197PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WISEMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff instituted this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1487f, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2202, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. She challenges the policy of defendants Metropolitan Development and Housing Agency [MDHA] 1 and Jack D. Harrington, Executive Director of MDHA, 2 of terminating rent subsidy benefits under section 201(a)(8) of the United States Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f [hereinafter referred to as “Section 8”], without providing a preter-mination hearing, and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Doris Holbrook v. Henry C. Pitt, and Third-Party v. Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Third- PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Eidson v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Gussie Davis v. Mansfield Metropolitan Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Hosea Simmons and Andrea Williams v. William Ryan Drew and the Housing Authority of the City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Vandermark v. Housing Authority of City of YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.