Legal Opinion
Baker v. Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 6, 1980No. Civ. C-1-78-38PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARL B. RUBIN, Chief Judge.
In this class action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief as well as attorneys’ fees for alleged violations of Section 8, Title II of the Community and Urban Development Act of 1974 (Section 8), 1 federal regulations and the United States Constitution. Defendants are Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority (CMHA) and Henry Stefanik, sued individually and as executive director of the CMHA. Jurisdiction over this action is properly invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343.
Plaintiffs have filed a motion for summary…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Eidson v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Gussie Davis v. Mansfield Metropolitan Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Tedford v. Massachusetts Housing Finance AgencyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Vandermark v. Housing Authority of City of YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Edith HARPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.