Legal Opinion
Arrowhead Mut. Service Co. v. Faust
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 28, 1968No. Civ. 8364PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GABBERT, J. pro tem. *
—Defendant Faust appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs after a court trial. The action was brought to restrain Faust from carrying on a real estate business on a lot owned by him in claimed violation of certain restrictions on the use of the lot for other than residential purposes.
The plaintiff Arrowhead Mutual Service Company (hereinafter referred to as Mutual Company) was the claimed owner of reversionary rights in the tract of land later described. The Mutual Company was a wholly owned subsidiary of plaintiff Lake Arrowhead Development Company (hereinafter…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Wing v. Forest Lawn Cemetery Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Riley v. Bear Creek Planning CommitteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Payne v. United California BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- MacDonald Properties, Inc. v. Bel-Air Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Sain v. SilvestreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Ezer v. FuchslochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.