Legal Opinion

In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Burick

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1999No. 98-2266PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*4ORDER OF THE COMMISSION OF JUDGES.

This matter came to be reviewed by a commission of five judges appointed by the Supreme Court of Ohio pursuant to Gov.Jud.R II(5)(E)(1) and R.C. 2701.11. The commission members are Judge Charles E. Henry, Chair, and Judges Peggy Bryant, Ann Marie Tracey, Richard K. Warren, and Frederick C. Hany II.

On September 28, 1998, the complainant, Charles E. Brown, filed a complaint with the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court. The complaint alleged that the respondent, Elizabeth A. Burick [last know business address in Canton, Ohio,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Bode v. WelchOhio Supreme Court · 1875
  3. In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against MorrisOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against HildebrandtOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. John Ken Alzheimer's Center v. Ohio Certificate of Need Review BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In the Matter Of: The Hon. Stephen O. Callaghan, Judge-Elect of the 28th CircuitWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. Tamburrino (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. KaupOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API