Legal Opinion

In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Morris

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1997No. 96-2586PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Commission of Judges.

This matter came to be reviewed by a commission of five judges appointed by the Supreme Court of Ohio pursuant to Gov.Jud.R. II(5)(E)(1) and R.C. 2701.11.

The commission members are as follows: Judges Sheila G. Farmer, John D. Schmitt, Judith A. Nicely, Margaret K. Weaver, and Cynthia C. Lazarus, Chair.

On October 24, 1996, the complainant, Thomas E. Compton,1 filed a complaint with the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court contending that the respondent, Patricia A. Morris, had broadcast false information about her opponent…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against O’TooleOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. CarrOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. Horton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. Tamburrino (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against BurickOhio Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API