Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Kaup

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 2004No. 2003-1864PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} On February 10, 2003, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a two-count complaint charging respondent, Gerhard “Gary” H. Kaup of Middletown, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0011210, with several violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The respondent answered, admitting some facts and disputing others.

{¶ 2} On July 18, 2003, a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline conducted a hearing. At the hearing, the parties agreed to stipulations of facts and exhibits. Additionally, respondent testified before the panel and offered an additional exhibit that was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Complaint Against Judge HarperOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against HildebrandtOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against BurickOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Platt v. Bd. of Comm'rs on Grievances & Discipline of the Ohio Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. Ohio State Bar Association v. McCaffertyOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. ParkerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. SquireOhio Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API