Legal Opinion

Travis v. Barkhurst

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1853PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Replevin by Barkhurst against Travis for a bay mare. Pleas, the general issue, and property in the defendant. Issues of fact. Jury trial, and verdict for the plaintiff. Motion for a new trial overruled, and judgment on the verdict.

It is claimed that said judgment should be reversed:

1. Because of the refusal of the Circuit Court to grant a new trial on account of the defendant having been surprised by the testimony of certain of the plaintiff’s witnesses. As a general rule, such surprise is not a sufficient ground for a new trial; and we see nothing in the record satisfying us that the Court…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Graeter v. FowlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
  2. Collis v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HendricksIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SponierIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Atkisson v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Jacobson v. HammanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API