Travis v. Barkhurst
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Replevin by Barkhurst against Travis for a bay mare. Pleas, the general issue, and property in the defendant. Issues of fact. Jury trial, and verdict for the plaintiff. Motion for a new trial overruled, and judgment on the verdict.
It is claimed that said judgment should be reversed:
1. Because of the refusal of the Circuit Court to grant a new trial on account of the defendant having been surprised by the testimony of certain of the plaintiff’s witnesses. As a general rule, such surprise is not a sufficient ground for a new trial; and we see nothing in the record satisfying us that the Court…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Graeter v. FowlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
- Collis v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
3Cited by4 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HendricksIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SponierIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Atkisson v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Jacobson v. HammanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922