Legal Opinion
Charles Clark v. Jack R. Duckworth and Indiana Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 13, 1990No. 89-3497PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted Charles Clark of attempted rape, battery and intimidation in connection with the rape and beating of a woman in Indiana. After filing several post-trial motions and unsuccessful appeals to Indiana state courts, Clark petitioned a federal district court for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2254. That court determined that Clark's constitutional rights had been violated at trial and therefore granted his petition subject to a new trial. Jack R. Duckworth, the Superintendent of the Indiana State Prison at Michigan City, Indiana, appeals…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Copas v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Steele v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Clark v. DuckworthDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
- Corcoran v. LevenhagenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Sandoval v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.