Legal Opinion

Clark v. Duckworth

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided August 12, 1991No. Civ. S 89-270PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ALLEN SHARP, Chief Judge.

This court must now comply with the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit in the reported decision of Clark v. Duckworth, 906 F.2d 1174 (7th Cir.1990). Specifically, Part IV of Judge Cudahy’s opinion at pages 1178-79 states:

This conclusion, however, should not be read to suggest that Clark has defaulted all of his habeas claims. Indeed, the district court based its decision to grant Clark’s petition for habeas corpus on a claim never made by Clark in his brief before that court. In its Memorandum and Order, the…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. Marvin BerkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burris v. FarleyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
  2. Spinks v. McBrideDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
  3. Calhoun v. FarleyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
  4. Wickliffe v. FarleyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1992
  5. Donzell Gerald v. Jack R. Duckworth and Attorney General of the State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API