Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Constanti v. Darwin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1918No. 14837PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court May 2, 1918, for a writ of mandate to compel the state fish commissioner to issue to the relator a purse seine fishing license.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate to require the fish commissioner of this state to issue to the relator a purse seine fishing license for the Puget Sound district for the current year.

The facts are conceded as follows: The relator is a native of Austria-Hungary. He came to the United States in May, 1913, and since June of that year has been an actual resident of this state. On the 29th day of December, 1913, he regularly, and in the manner required by law, declared his intention to become a citizen of the United States. Since the year 1914, and during the years 1915, 1916 and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Speidel v. N. Barstow Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1917
  2. Schulz v. Raimes & Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917
  3. Fritz Schultz, Jr., Co. v. Raimes & Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Petition of BernheimerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Matsuda v. LuondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Hughes v. TechtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. Manaka v. Monterey Sardine Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1942
  5. Black v. Cutter LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API