Legal Opinion
Speidel v. N. Barstow Co.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided July 27, 1917No. 60PublishedCited by 7 opinions
In Equity. Suit by E. Speidel and others against the N. Barstow Company. On motion to dismiss bill.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
The case is before the court upon the following motion:
“1. And now comes the defendant herein and respectfully represents to this honorable court that, as appears of record in the pleadings heroin, the plaintiffs are Fredrieli.and Eugene Speidel, citizens of the German Empire, and subjects of the German Emperor, and residents of Pforzheim in the Grand Duchy of Baden, and Wilhelm' Forstner and Walter Forstner, subjects of the German Emperor and residents of .Providence, Rhode Island.
“2. That, as this honorable court has judicial notice, a state of war now exists between…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Pope Manufacturing Co. v. Gormully & Jeffery Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Plettenberg, Holthaus & Co. v. I. J. Kalmon & Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- Frabutt v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis R. CoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- State ex rel. Constanti v. DarwinWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Verano v. DeAngelis Coal Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
- Bernheimer v. VurpillotDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
- Manaka v. Monterey Sardine Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.