Legal Opinion · Dissent

Black v. Cutter Laboratories

California Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1955No. S. F. No. 18522Published

1Dissent

TRAYNOR, J., Dissenting.

All the members of the court agree that we are bound by the determination of the arbitrators* that for two and one-half years Doris Walker’s com*810munist affiliations were a matter of indifference to Cutter, that Cutter therefore waived her communist affiliations as a ground for discharging her, that it discharged her solely because of her lawful union activity, and that in doing so it violated its collective bargaining agreement with the Union. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1280-1293; Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp. v. C.S.T., Ltd., 29 Cal.2d 228, 233 [174 P.2d 441] ; Sapp v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Crofoot v. Blair Holdings Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp. v. C.S.T., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Ex Parte KawatoSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API