Legal Opinion

Hillman v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Fall River

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 1, 1987PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

In 1951, four members of the Hillman family, without consideration, gave a release deed to the Roman Catholic Bishop of Fall River (Bishop) of a seven and one-half acre parcel of land in North Attleborough. The deed read: “We . . . release to the . . . Bishop ... for the use of St. Mary’s Parish for educational, religious or recreational purposes, all our right, title, and interest in the land. ...” The question on appeal is whether that language and circumstances attending the conveyance in 1951 impressed a charitable trust limited to specific charitable purposes upon the Bishop’s title.

At…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Building Inspector of Lancaster v. SandersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Matsushita Electric Corp. of America v. Sonus Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. White v. DitsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  5. Springgate v. School Committee of MattapoisettMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boston Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Reynolds (In Re Boston Regional Medical Center, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  2. Weaver v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Cohen v. City of LynnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  4. Dao Bui v. VazquezMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
  5. Suga v. MaumMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API