Legal Opinion

White v. Ditson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 28, 1885PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevens, J.

The defendants, who are the sureties on the bond of the late John P. Healy, as executor of the will of John Percival, having admitted a breach thereof, the case at bar has been referred to an assessor to report the facts, and is now before us upon a reservation of the questions of law raised upon the facts stated in his report, and in the subsequent agreement of additional facts by the parties.

It is not denied that Healy, as executor, paid all the debts, specific legacies, and funeral expenses of the testator. The first and most important inquiry is as to the responsibility of the sureties…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fontain v. RavenelSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Choate v. ArringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Nichols v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  4. SchoulerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Crocker v. DillonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Shulkin v. ShulkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Bellinger v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Bullard v. ChandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. In re Higgins' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Roach's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1907

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API