Legal Opinion
Hiland v. Ives
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided August 23, 1966No. File 110648PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.
This is an action brought in two counts by the plaintiffs, in the first count as residents and taxpayers of the state of Connecticut and city of Meriden, in the second count as property owners, seeking to enjoin the state highway commissioner from taking for the layout of a trunk-line highway, for the relocation of U.S. route 6A, any land within the boundaries of Hubbard Park, a public park in the city of Meriden. In addition to the named defendant, the parties have stipulated that the attorney general be made a party defendant to represent the public interest in the park property pursuant to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Bassett v. DesmondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Austin v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Waterbury Trust Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Cassidy v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. SchwartzwaldOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Ardmare Construction Co. v. FreedmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Unisys Corp. v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- CitiMortgage, Inc. v. PattersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. PiersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.