Legal Opinion
Austin v. Housing Authority
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 18, 1956PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, C. J.
In this action the plaintiffs seek an injunction restraining the commissioners of the Hartford Housing Authority, hereinafter referred to as the defendants, and the housing authority itself from awarding any contract to, and making payments pursuant to any contract of fire and extended coverage insurance with, the Firemen’s Mutual Insurance Company, hereinafter called Firemen’s, and an injunction requiring the defendants to reject the bid of Firemen’s as not being that of the lowest responsible bidder and directing them to award the contract to The Hartford County Mutual Fire Insurance…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lewellyn v. FrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Bassett v. DesmondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Cassidy v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Frick v. LewellynDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1924
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Lawrence Brunoli, Inc. v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Rose v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Ardmare Construction Co. v. FreedmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Unisys Corp. v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.