State v. P. B.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
P. B. appeals from a judgment ordering that he be committed to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days on the ground that he was dangerous to others. We reverse.
In the spring of 2005, appellant’s life, from all outward appearances, was more or less in order. He worked as a design engineer at Intel, the microchip company in Beaverton. Although he was under stress due to the responsibilities of his work and the long hours that he devoted to it — sometimes upward of 100 per week — he was, according to his wife, level-headed, reserved, thoughtful, and “very…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. WoolridgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. WoolridgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. BodellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. FurnishCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. K.S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- In Re PbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. KSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008