Legal Opinion

State v. K.S.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 29, 2008No. 061070509; A134072PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

The trial court committed appellant to the custody of the Mental Health Division after finding that, because of a mental disorder, he is a danger to himself and others. ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A); ORS 426.130. On de novo review, State v. North, 189 Or App 518, 520, 76 P3d 685 (2003), we conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the conclusion that appellant is a danger to others. Because we affirm the trial court on that basis, we do not reach the question of whether appellant is a danger to himself.

We take the following facts from the record. Although we do not reach the question…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. State v. M. L. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. P. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. S. E.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. State v. C. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. H. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. J. K.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. KSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API